<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Snippets code from my daily experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another unnecessary code resource blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on You must Disable or Remove Adblock to visit this website, no Thanks! by Block Adblock Plus</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/you-must-disable-or-remove-adblock-to-visit-this-website-no-thanks/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Block Adblock Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=833#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Looks like it&#039;s becoming a trend on the internet... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.block-adblock-plus.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.block-adblock-plus.com/&lt;/a&gt;

Plus with what&#039;s in the news with Google News restricting access it seems the fair way. The age of &#039;free&#039; on the internet is ending: get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it&#8217;s becoming a trend on the internet&#8230; <a href="http://www.block-adblock-plus.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.block-adblock-plus.com/</a></p>
<p>Plus with what&#8217;s in the news with Google News restricting access it seems the fair way. The age of &#8216;free&#8217; on the internet is ending: get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Jboss on same machine (shutdown) by J2FF</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/more-jboss-on-same-machine-shutdown/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>J2FF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/more-jboss-on-same-machine-shutdown/#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Solved my problem too ^_^

NamingService port number is in jboss-service.xml file ... juste in case it can help beginner like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solved my problem too ^_^</p>
<p>NamingService port number is in jboss-service.xml file &#8230; juste in case it can help beginner like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You must Disable or Remove Adblock to visit this website, no Thanks! by al</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/you-must-disable-or-remove-adblock-to-visit-this-website-no-thanks/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=833#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re kidding yourself if you think you&#039;ve never bought a product because of their advertising. We&#039;d all like to think that we&#039;re immune to advertising because on the whole it annoys us, and while you might not click a link and buy something directly, you definitely are affected by it. 

When you go into the store, for example, you make a choice between products on the shelf, and I defy you to say you always choose products you&#039;ve never heard of. You buy products you think you know, even if you haven&#039;t tried them, because their advertising has made you feel you have a relationship with them. This might sound like a stretch, but it&#039;s exactly what happens.

If there are two brands of milk, one called &#039;skdxkcg&#039; and the other called &#039;qwerty&#039;, you&#039;re at some point going to choose qwerty because you have a feeling that you &#039;know&#039; the brand. That&#039;s because the advertising has, possibly over the course of a while, been making the product known to you, if only just the name. 

The same applies on the web. If you see an ad for a widget a hundred times, you might never click on it. But if one day you were looking for a widget but couldn&#039;t find one and the ad presented itself, you might well click on it.

Or you make a mental note that here&#039;s a provider of widgets. You might not buy immediately, but what they&#039;re counting on is that when you&#039;re faced with the choice of &#039;Widget&#039;s widgets&#039; and &#039;XYZ widgets&#039; you&#039;ll choose the one you&#039;ve heard of. 

As for reviews, lot of adverts will contain some form of 2nd opinion, review or recommendation that says &#039;it&#039;s not just us saying this is good&#039;. But can you trust these either? Many of the &#039;recommendations&#039; out there are solicited by the ad companies to people who have an interest in pleasing the advertisers. (Many &#039;review&#039; sites are even run by the owners of the products or their affiliates)

As for your comments on malware, I think you may be right, but I don&#039;t think a site will block you only because they want to infect you. There may be other reasons, such as there being absolutely no point in you being there if there&#039;s no opportunity to sell you anything. Harsh, but true. It wouldn&#039;t even be worth the chance of you recommending them to someone, because since you don&#039;t see their ads, you&#039;re already highly unlikely to do so anyway.

Honestly, if advertising didn&#039;t work, do you really think they&#039;d spend all that money on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re kidding yourself if you think you&#8217;ve never bought a product because of their advertising. We&#8217;d all like to think that we&#8217;re immune to advertising because on the whole it annoys us, and while you might not click a link and buy something directly, you definitely are affected by it. </p>
<p>When you go into the store, for example, you make a choice between products on the shelf, and I defy you to say you always choose products you&#8217;ve never heard of. You buy products you think you know, even if you haven&#8217;t tried them, because their advertising has made you feel you have a relationship with them. This might sound like a stretch, but it&#8217;s exactly what happens.</p>
<p>If there are two brands of milk, one called &#8217;skdxkcg&#8217; and the other called &#8216;qwerty&#8217;, you&#8217;re at some point going to choose qwerty because you have a feeling that you &#8216;know&#8217; the brand. That&#8217;s because the advertising has, possibly over the course of a while, been making the product known to you, if only just the name. </p>
<p>The same applies on the web. If you see an ad for a widget a hundred times, you might never click on it. But if one day you were looking for a widget but couldn&#8217;t find one and the ad presented itself, you might well click on it.</p>
<p>Or you make a mental note that here&#8217;s a provider of widgets. You might not buy immediately, but what they&#8217;re counting on is that when you&#8217;re faced with the choice of &#8216;Widget&#8217;s widgets&#8217; and &#8216;XYZ widgets&#8217; you&#8217;ll choose the one you&#8217;ve heard of. </p>
<p>As for reviews, lot of adverts will contain some form of 2nd opinion, review or recommendation that says &#8216;it&#8217;s not just us saying this is good&#8217;. But can you trust these either? Many of the &#8216;recommendations&#8217; out there are solicited by the ad companies to people who have an interest in pleasing the advertisers. (Many &#8216;review&#8217; sites are even run by the owners of the products or their affiliates)</p>
<p>As for your comments on malware, I think you may be right, but I don&#8217;t think a site will block you only because they want to infect you. There may be other reasons, such as there being absolutely no point in you being there if there&#8217;s no opportunity to sell you anything. Harsh, but true. It wouldn&#8217;t even be worth the chance of you recommending them to someone, because since you don&#8217;t see their ads, you&#8217;re already highly unlikely to do so anyway.</p>
<p>Honestly, if advertising didn&#8217;t work, do you really think they&#8217;d spend all that money on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons by Firefox &#187; Current News Trends</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/karmic-koala-hides-firefox-context-menuitems-icons/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox &#187; Current News Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=911#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>[...] Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons « Snippets code &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons « Snippets code &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You must Disable or Remove Adblock to visit this website, no Thanks! by You</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/you-must-disable-or-remove-adblock-to-visit-this-website-no-thanks/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=833#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>While adverts may not be a good way to earn a living for most site, what they will do at a minimum is cover *some* of the hosting costs.

Just like you will walk away from a site telling you to remove adblock, I would consider it to be of equal nature if you are blocking the ads that they are putting up.

If you don&#039;t like the ads, walk away from the content. it is rather simple. As a consumer you have that choice. Playing it both ways is pretending to take the high ground while all you are doing is leeching - the work on the site may be mediocre or poor, but if you really think that, you had that chance to walk away.

As for &quot;my free site&quot; - its just a place holder and I do not expect to make any money off it ever. I do not care if people use adblockers, at the same time I personally refuse to use one as I consider it unfair to the content creators.

I am not encouraging sites to block people with adblock, but I am encouraging those that use adblock to consider what the consequences of their actions really are.

&quot;Free stuff means really free stuff without any bounds. If you dont believe in providing free content online dont expect people to visit your “FREE” website, you’re not worth it.&quot;

^^ If that was really the case, you would simply avoid the sites in question instead of needing to use adblock to get to the content without seeing any adverts. There is no high ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While adverts may not be a good way to earn a living for most site, what they will do at a minimum is cover *some* of the hosting costs.</p>
<p>Just like you will walk away from a site telling you to remove adblock, I would consider it to be of equal nature if you are blocking the ads that they are putting up.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like the ads, walk away from the content. it is rather simple. As a consumer you have that choice. Playing it both ways is pretending to take the high ground while all you are doing is leeching &#8211; the work on the site may be mediocre or poor, but if you really think that, you had that chance to walk away.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;my free site&#8221; &#8211; its just a place holder and I do not expect to make any money off it ever. I do not care if people use adblockers, at the same time I personally refuse to use one as I consider it unfair to the content creators.</p>
<p>I am not encouraging sites to block people with adblock, but I am encouraging those that use adblock to consider what the consequences of their actions really are.</p>
<p>&#8220;Free stuff means really free stuff without any bounds. If you dont believe in providing free content online dont expect people to visit your “FREE” website, you’re not worth it.&#8221;</p>
<p>^^ If that was really the case, you would simply avoid the sites in question instead of needing to use adblock to get to the content without seeing any adverts. There is no high ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You must Disable or Remove Adblock to visit this website, no Thanks! by junk0</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/you-must-disable-or-remove-adblock-to-visit-this-website-no-thanks/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>junk0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=833#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>whatever the argument may be, ethical / un-ethical or free / paid content I do not support ads, as they dont make 99% of the people buy products off the internet. It is just illogical. For those who think you can make easy money of blogging etc sites, well start looking for paid blogs. Dont think that people intrinsically expect you to get paid for what you do online, make a move yourself by moving to a paid site.
Reiterating my point, even if you move to a paid site i will never visit a site that says &quot;you have adblock installed screw you&quot; and i will not visit your paid site unless it has stuff of the utmost importance to my existence. I guess this pretty much means that leave free blogging and get a job, or write a book. Dont hate the world if you cant prove a point.
Free stuff means really free stuff without any bounds. If you dont believe in providing free content online dont expect people to visit your &quot;FREE&quot; website, you&#039;re not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatever the argument may be, ethical / un-ethical or free / paid content I do not support ads, as they dont make 99% of the people buy products off the internet. It is just illogical. For those who think you can make easy money of blogging etc sites, well start looking for paid blogs. Dont think that people intrinsically expect you to get paid for what you do online, make a move yourself by moving to a paid site.<br />
Reiterating my point, even if you move to a paid site i will never visit a site that says &#8220;you have adblock installed screw you&#8221; and i will not visit your paid site unless it has stuff of the utmost importance to my existence. I guess this pretty much means that leave free blogging and get a job, or write a book. Dont hate the world if you cant prove a point.<br />
Free stuff means really free stuff without any bounds. If you dont believe in providing free content online dont expect people to visit your &#8220;FREE&#8221; website, you&#8217;re not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons by dafi</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/karmic-koala-hides-firefox-context-menuitems-icons/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>dafi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=911#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s difficult to eliminate or simply reduce this type of problem, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/2.28/#rnusers.cleanup&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; posted by mzz it&#039;s very clear about menuitem icons new behaviour but Gnome can&#039;t prevent all implications on other applications, obviously this is true for Gnome and for all other software communities.
The real problem for me consist to be sure these type of informations arrive to the right destination and this is very very difficult to do, something like &quot;Gnome UI modifications and their impact on Firefox&quot;, just my two cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s difficult to eliminate or simply reduce this type of problem, the <a href="http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/2.28/#rnusers.cleanup" rel="nofollow">link</a> posted by mzz it&#8217;s very clear about menuitem icons new behaviour but Gnome can&#8217;t prevent all implications on other applications, obviously this is true for Gnome and for all other software communities.<br />
The real problem for me consist to be sure these type of informations arrive to the right destination and this is very very difficult to do, something like &#8220;Gnome UI modifications and their impact on Firefox&#8221;, just my two cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons by Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons « Snippets code &#8230; &#124; Firefox News on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/karmic-koala-hides-firefox-context-menuitems-icons/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons « Snippets code &#8230; &#124; Firefox News on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=911#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>[...] Visit link: Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons « Snippets code &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visit link: Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons « Snippets code &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons by Benjamin Otte</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/karmic-koala-hides-firefox-context-menuitems-icons/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=911#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there&#039;s anything we GNOME guys can do to communicate such changes better so that you don&#039;t end up chasing non-existing bugs.
Got any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there&#8217;s anything we GNOME guys can do to communicate such changes better so that you don&#8217;t end up chasing non-existing bugs.<br />
Got any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karmic Koala hides Firefox context menuitems icons by dafi</title>
		<link>http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/karmic-koala-hides-firefox-context-menuitems-icons/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>dafi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dafizilla.wordpress.com/?p=911#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the UI shortcut, I update the post.

Consider not all users, me too :(, read products releases notes not only for gnome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the UI shortcut, I update the post.</p>
<p>Consider not all users, me too <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> , read products releases notes not only for gnome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
